tohoku tsunami 2011 case study

Case Study: How does Japan live with earthquakes?

Japan lies within one of the most tectonically active zones in the world. It experiences over 400 earthquakes every day. The majority of these are not felt by humans and are only detected by instruments. Japan has been hit by a number of high-intensity earthquakes in the past. Since 2000 there are have been 16000 fatalities as the result of tectonic activity.

Japan is located on the Pacific Ring of Fire, where the North American, Pacific, Eurasian and Philippine plates come together. Northern Japan is on top of the western tip of the North American plate. Southern Japan sits mostly above the Eurasian plate. This leads to the formation of volcanoes such as Mount Unzen and Mount Fuji. Movements along these plate boundaries also present the risk of tsunamis to the island nation. The Pacific Coastal zone, on the east coast of Japan, is particularly vulnerable as it is very densely populated.

The 2011 Japan Earthquake: Tōhoku

Japan experienced one of its largest seismic events on March 11 2011. A magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred 70km off the coast of the northern island of Honshu where the Pacific and North American plate meet. It is the largest recorded earthquake to hit Japan and is in the top five in the world since records began in 1900. The earthquake lasted for six minutes.

A map to show the location of the 2011 Japan Earthquake

The earthquake had a significant impact on the area. The force of the megathrust earthquake caused the island of Honshu to move east 2.4m. Parts of the Japanese coastline dr[[ed by 60cm. The seabed close to the focus of the earthquake rose by 7m and moved westwards between 40-50m. In addition to this, the earthquake shifted the Earth 10-15cm on its axis.

The earthquake triggered a tsunami which reached heights of 40m when it reached the coast. The tsunami wave reached 10km inland in some places.

What were the social impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

The tsunami in 2011 claimed the lives of 15,853 people and injured 6023. The majority of the victims were over the age of 60 (66%). 90% of the deaths was caused by drowning. The remaining 10% died as the result of being crushed in buildings or being burnt. 3282 people were reported missing, presumed dead.

Disposing of dead bodies proved to be very challenging because of the destruction to crematoriums, morgues and the power infrastructure. As the result of this many bodies were buried in mass graves to reduce the risk of disease spreading.

Many people were displaced as the result of the tsunami. According to Save the Children 100,000 children were separated from their families. The main reason for this was that children were at school when the earthquake struck. In one elementary school, 74 of 108 students and 10 out of 13 staff lost their lives.

More than 333000 people had to live in temporary accommodation. National Police Agency of Japan figures shows almost 300,000 buildings were destroyed and a further one million damaged, either by the quake, tsunami or resulting fires. Almost 4,000 roads, 78 bridges and 29 railways were also affected. Reconstruction is still taking place today. Some communities have had to be relocated from their original settlements.

What were the economic impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

The estimated cost of the earthquake, including reconstruction, is £181 billion. Japanese authorities estimate 25 million tonnes of debris were generated in the three worst-affected prefectures (counties). This is significantly more than the amount of debris created during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. 47,700 buildings were destroyed and 143,300 were damaged. 230,000 vehicles were destroyed or damaged. Four ports were destroyed and a further 11 were affected in the northeast of Japan.

There was a significant impact on power supplies in Japan. 4.4 million households and businesses lost electricity. 11 nuclear reactors were shut down when the earthquake occurred. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was decommissioned because all six of its reactors were severely damaged. Seawater disabled the plant’s cooling systems which caused the reactor cores to meltdown, leading to the release of radioactivity. Radioactive material continues to be released by the plant and vegetation and soil within the 30km evacuation zone is contaminated. Power cuts continued for several weeks after the earthquake and tsunami. Often, these lasted between 3-4 hours at a time. The earthquake also had a negative impact on the oil industry as two refineries were set on fire during the earthquake.

Transport was also negatively affected by the earthquake. Twenty-three train stations were swept away and others experienced damage. Many road bridges were damaged or destroyed.

Agriculture was affected as salt water contaminated soil and made it impossible to grow crops.

The stock market crashed and had a negative impact on companies such as Sony and Toyota as the cost of the earthquake was realised.  Production was reduced due to power cuts and assembly of goods, such as cars overseas, were affected by the disruption in the supply of parts from Japan.

What were the political impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?

Government debt was increased when it injects billions of yen into the economy. This was at a time when the government were attempting to reduce the national debt.

Several years before the disaster warnings had been made about the poor defences that existed at nuclear power plants in the event of a tsunami. A number of executives at the Fukushima power plant resigned in the aftermath of the disaster. A movement against nuclear power, which Japan heavily relies on, developed following the tsunami.

The disaster at Fukushima added political weight in European countries were anti-nuclear bodies used the event to reinforce their arguments against nuclear power.

Privacy Overview

Pin it on pinterest.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• 0 Shopping Cart £ 0.00 -->

Japan Earthquake 2011

Japan earthquake 2011 case study.

An earthquake measuring 9.0 on the Richter Scale struck off Japan’s northeast coast, about 250 miles (400km) from Tokyo at a depth of 20 miles.

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake happened at 2:46 pm (local time) on Friday, March 11, 2011.

The earthquake occurred 250 miles off the North East Coast of Japan’s main island Honshu.

Japan 2011 Earthquake map

Japan is located on the eastern edge of the Eurasian Plate. The Eurasian plate, which is continental, is subducted by the Pacific Plate, an oceanic plate forming a subduction zone to the east of Japan. This type of plate margin is known as a destructive plate margin . The process of subduction is not smooth. Friction causes the Pacific Plate to stick. Pressure builds and is released as an earthquake.

Friction has built up over time, and when released, this caused a massive ‘megathrust’ earthquake.

The amount of energy released in this single earthquake was 600 million times the energy of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb.

Scientists drilled into the subduction zone soon after the earthquake and discovered a thin, slippery clay layer lining the fault. The researchers think this clay layer allowed the two plates to slide an incredible distance, some 164 feet (50 metres), facilitating the enormous earthquake and tsunami .

2011 Japan Earthquake Map

The earthquake occurred at a relatively shallow depth of 20 miles below the surface of the Pacific Ocean. This, combined with the high magnitude, caused a tsunami (find out more about how a tsunami is formed on the BBC website).

Areas affected by the 2011 Japanese earthquake.

What were the primary effects of the 2011 Japan earthquake?

Impacts on people

Death and injury – Some 15,894 people died, and 26,152 people were injured. 130,927 people were displaced, and 2,562 remain missing.

Damage – 332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges and 26 railways were destroyed or damaged. 300 hospitals were damaged, and 11 were destroyed.

Blackouts – Over 4.4 million households were left without electricity in North-East Japan.

Transport – Japan’s transport network suffered huge disruptions.

Impacts on the environment

Landfall – some coastal areas experienced land subsidence as the earthquake dropped the beachfront in some places by more than 50 cm.

Land movement – due to tectonic shift, the quake moved parts of North East Japan 2.4 m closer to North America.

Plate shifts – It has been estimated by geologists that the Pacific plate has slipped westwards by between 20 and 40 m.

Seabed shift – The seabed near the epicentre shifted by 24 m, and the seabed off the coast of the Miyagi province has moved by 3 m.

Earth axis moves – The earthquake moved the earth’s axis between 10 and 25 cm, shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds.

Liquefaction occurred in many of the parts of Tokyo built on reclaimed land. 1,046 buildings were damaged

What were the secondary effects of the 2011 Japan earthquake?

Economy – The earthquake was the most expensive natural disaster in history, with an economic cost of US$235 billion.

Tsunami –  Waves up to 40 m in high devastated entire coastal areas and resulted in the loss of thousands of lives. This caused a lot of damage and pollution up to 6 miles inland. The tsunami warnings in coastal areas were only followed by 58% who headed for higher ground. The wave hit 49% of those not following the warning.

Nuclear power – Seven reactors at the Fukushima nuclear power station experienced a meltdown. Levels of radiation were over eight times the normal levels.

Transport –  Rural areas remained isolated for a long time because the tsunami destroyed major roads and local trains and buses. Sections of the Tohoku Expressway were damaged. Railway lines were damaged, and some trains were derailed. 

Aftermath – The ‘Japan move forward committee’ thought that young adults and teenagers could help rebuild parts of Japan devastated by the earthquake.

Coastal changes – The tsunami was able to travel further inland due to a 250-mile stretch of coastline dropping by 0.6 m.

What were the immediate responses to the Japan 2011 earthquake?

• The Japan Meteorological Agency issued tsunami warnings three minutes after the earthquake.
• Scientists had been able to predict where the tsunami would hit after the earthquake using modelling and forecasting technology so that responses could be directed to the appropriate areas.
• Rescue workers and around 100,000 members of the Japan Self-Defence Force were dispatched to help with search and rescue operations within hours of the tsunami hitting the coast.
• Although many search and rescue teams focused on recovering bodies washing up on shore following the tsunami, some people were rescued from under the rubble with the help of sniffer dogs.
• The government declared a 20 km evacuation zone around the Fukushima nuclear power plant to reduce the threat of radiation exposure to local residents.
• Japan received international help from the US military, and search and rescue teams were sent from New Zealand, India, South Korea, China and Australia.
• Access to the affected areas was restricted because many were covered in debris and mud following the tsunami, so it was difficult to provide immediate support in some areas.
• Hundreds of thousands of people who had lost their homes were evacuated to temporary shelters in schools and other public buildings or relocated to other areas.
• Many evacuees came from the exclusion zone surrounding the Fukushima nuclear power plant. After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown, those in the area had their radiation levels checked, and their health monitored to ensure they did not receive dangerous exposure to radiation. Many evacuated from the area around the nuclear power plant were given iodine tablets to reduce the risk of radiation poisoning.

What were the long-term responses to the Japan 2011 earthquake?

• In April 2011, one month after the event occurred, the central government established the Reconstruction Policy Council to develop a national recovery and reconstruction outlook for tsunami-resilient communities. The Japanese government has approved a budget of 23 trillion yen (approximately £190 billion) to be spent over ten years. Central to the New Growth Strategy is creating a ‘Special Zones for Reconstruction’ system. These aim to provide incentives to attract investment, both in terms of business and reconstruction, into the Tohoku region.
• Also, the central government decided on a coastal protection policy, such as seawalls and breakwaters which would be designed to ensure their performance to a potential tsunami level of up to the approximately 150-year recurrence interval.
• In December 2011, the central government enacted the ‘Act on the Development of Tsunami-resilient Communities’. According to the principle that ‘Human life is most important, this law promotes the development of tsunami-resistant communities based on the concept of multiple defences, which combines infrastructure development and other measures targeting the largest class tsunami.
• Japan’s economic growth after the Second World War was the world’s envy. However, over the last 20 years, the economy has stagnated and been in and out of recession. The 11 March earthquake wiped 5–10% off the value of Japanese stock markets, and there has been global concern over Japan’s ability to recover from the disaster. The priority for Japan’s long-term response is to rebuild the infrastructure in the affected regions and restore and improve the economy’s health as a whole.
• By the 24th of March 2011, 375 km of the Tohoku Expressway (which links the region to Tokyo) was repaired and reopened.
• The runway at Sendai Airport had been badly damaged. However, it was restored and reusable by the 29th of March due to a joint effort by the Japanese Defence Force and the US Army.
• Other important areas of reconstruction include the energy, water supply and telecommunications infrastructure. As of November 2011, 96% of the electricity supply had been restored, 98% of the water supply and 99% of the landline network.

Why do people live in high-risk areas in Japan?

There are several reasons why people live in areas of Japan at risk of tectonic hazards:

• They have lived there all their lives, are close to family and friends and have an attachment to the area.
• The northeast has fertile farmland and rich fishing waters.
• There are good services, schools and hospitals.
• 75% of Japan is mountainous and flat land is mainly found in coastal areas, which puts pressure on living space.
• They are confident about their safety due to the protective measures that have been taken, such as the construction of tsunami walls.

Japan’s worst previous earthquake was of 8.3 magnitude and killed 143,000 people in Kanto in 1923. A magnitude 7.2 quake in Kobe killed 6,400 people in 1995 .

Premium Resources

Please support internet geography.

If you've found the resources on this page useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Related Topics

Use the images below to explore related GeoTopics.

Previous Topic Page

Topic home, next topic page, share this:.

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Search Internet Geography

Latest Blog Entries

Pin It on Pinterest

• Click to share
• Print Friendly

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

The 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Reconstruction and Restoration

2018, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related papers

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011

This article briefly reviews the causes and impacts of the massive eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011, and comments on the response measures taken by Japan to cope with this devastating disaster. Mass losses occurred mostly because the intensity of the quake and the induced tsunami exceeded local coping capacity. Particularly, the nuclear power plant crisis triggered by the tsunami significantly increased the short-and long-term impacts of the disaster. While the coping capacity Japanese society built after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji great earthquake tremendously mitigated the damages, there is room for improvement despite Japan's great efforts in this disaster. Investigating the tsunami preparedness of the coastal nuclear power plants is an issue of paramount importance. In response to future large-scale disasters, there is an urgent need for a highly collaborative framework based on which all available resources could be mobilized; a mutual assistance and rescue system against catastrophes among regions and countries on the basis of international humanitarian aid; and further in-depth research on the multi-hazard and disaster-chain phenomenon in large-scale disasters and corresponding governance approaches.

Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2012

The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was one of the world's worst tsunamis and caused devastating damage in many Asian countries. Then, in 2011, Japan was hit by a tsunami that was generated by the greatest earthquake in the country's history. This paper discusses the damage caused by these tsunamis and subsequent reconstruction. Introduced first are the experience gained and lessons learned for future tsunami mitigation, such as tsunami awareness, proper evacuation building and the memorial parks created in the countries affected by the 2004 tsunami (Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand). Second, the damage by the 2011 tsunami to structures designed to protect against tsunamis is summarized. Most of these structures could not withstand and protect from the tsunami because they were not designed for such a large tsunami. Human casualties and building damage are discussed using fatality ratios and fragility curves, respectively. These analyses show that experience and awareness help reduce human casualties in the Sanriku area, and wooden houses damaged by the 2011 tsunami fared better than in previous historical events. Finally, examples of ongoing reconstruction in Japan are introduced. Most reconstruction efforts were planned after considering the lessons learned from the tsunami's impact, and the towns in question are now strengthening their disaster prevention-related plans to be better prepared for future tsunamis.

Geographical review of Japan, 2014

Japan is subject to disasters due to its natural condition. Until the 1970s, the relationship between river flood and the geomorphological condition in alluvial plains was studied and the results were applied to hazard mapping. After the 1980s, landslide and debris flow, earthquake, and volcanic activity became the main problems of disaster prevention. After the Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake Disaster of 1995, geographical studies on earthquake disaster have increased. The Association of Japanese Geographers (AJG) established the Commission of Disaster Responses in 2001, and the commission holds symposia on disasters from the geographical viewpoint every year in the general meeting of the AJG. The mapping of the tsunami stricken area of the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster of 2011 was carried out by a special team of the Association of Japanese Geographers. A study relating to that disaster is being conducted now in the fields of physical geography and human geography. The role of the Japanese geographer is becoming very important throughout the world in the study of disasters.

Springer eBooks, 2017

Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), 2015

On the second anniversary of the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) UNU-EHS together with the University of Tohoku organized a scientific workshop. The workshop provided researchers with a unique forum in which to explore and share the lessons learned following the GEJE and Tsunami. The conference proceedings summarized here represent the collective efforts by scholars who have examined the disaster from various angles.

Technikfolgenabschätzung–Theorie und Praxis, 2011

Socio-economic losses associated with the earthquake of magnitude 9 on March 11th, 2011 off the Tohoku coast of Japan are presented and discussed. These include presentation of building damage, casualty-and shelter needs disaggregated for the earthquake and tsunami, but also the implications of the loss of essential utilities in Honshu's production capacity, and consequences of the Fukushima 1 nuclear power plant accident. We trace the Tohoku catastrophe from the initial triggering earthquake through the cascading-and ...

Disasters, the sudden events or the accidents that leads to great destruction of human population, takes place either by nature’s worst attack on human being or by man itself in pace of scientific, technological and industrial growth and development or in the name of religious conflicts leading terrorist attacks. Asia and other countries specially lying on the pacific island regions are very prone to natural disasters like earthquake, tsunami, landslide, volcanic eruptions, typhoon etc. Japan, a country of peace with world’s best technology can also be called a country of disasters as disasters are very often to Japan. Throughout its history Japan has learnt to live with earthquakes and although the majority are so small but from time to time the country gets hit by a major disaster, resulting in enormous loss of life. Recently Japan faced the great triple disaster on March11, 2011.The aftermath of the biggest earthquake in Japan's history, and the tsunami and nuclear disaster that followed, offers a map for preparing for the next catastrophe. Japan’s early warning system, rigorous building codes and emergency systems, earthquake preparedness, strong determination and good cooperation between local and central government save many people to die from earthquake turned disaster. Japan has handled the disaster exceptionally well and these lessons can help other nations or societies to prepare for further disasters. Keywords: Natural disaster, Triple disaster 2011, Earthquake Preparedness, Disaster Management.

Journal of Motor Behavior, 2014

In: Yuval Gadot, The Landfill of Early Roman Jerusalem: The 2013‒2014 Excavations in Area D3 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2022), 97–122. , 2022

Lexis, 2024

Lentera Hukum, 2018

The Inner Life of Race: Bodies, Souls and the History of Racial Power, 2024

Journal of Oral Science, 2012

Sociologie et sociétés, 2002

Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement), 2018

Pattern Recognition, 2006

ASA Monitor, 2022

Fertility and Sterility, 1999

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2012

Related topics

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

The 2011 Tohoku Tsunami on the Coast of Mexico: A Case Study

• Published: 28 June 2017
• Volume 174 , pages 2961–2986, ( 2017 )

Cite this article

• Oleg Zaytsev 1 ,
• Alexander B. Rabinovich 2 , 3 &
• Richard E. Thomson 2  

521 Accesses

20 Citations

Explore all metrics

The Tohoku (East Japan) earthquake of 11 March 2011 ( M w 9.0) generated a great trans-oceanic tsunami that spread throughout the Pacific Ocean, where it was measured by numerous coastal tide gauges and open-ocean DART (Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis) stations. Statistical and spectral analyses of the tsunami waves recorded along the Pacific coast of Mexico have enabled us to estimate the principal parameters of the waves along the coast and to compare statistical features of the tsunami with other tsunamis recorded on this coast. We identify coastal “hot spots”—Manzanillo, Zihuatanejo, Acapulco, and Ensenada—corresponding to sites having highest tsunami hazard potential, where wave heights during the 2011 event exceeded 1.5–2 m and tsunami-induced currents were strong enough to close port operations. Based on a joint spectral analysis of the tsunamis and background noise, we reconstructed the spectra of tsunami waves in the deep ocean and found that, with the exception of the high-frequency spectral band (>5 cph), the spectra are in close agreement with the “true” tsunami spectra determined from DART bottom pressure records. The departure of the high-frequency spectra in the coastal region from the deep-sea spectra is shown to be related to background infragravity waves generated in the coastal zone. The total energy and frequency content of the Tohoku tsunami is compared with the corresponding results for the 2010 Chilean tsunami. Our findings show that the integral open-ocean tsunami energy, I 0 , was ~2.30 cm 2 , or approximately 1.7 times larger than for the 2010 event. Comparison of this parameter with the mean coastal tsunami variance (451 cm 2 ) indicates that tsunami waves propagating onshore from the open ocean amplified by 14 times; the same was observed for the 2010 tsunami. The “tsunami colour” (frequency content) for the 2011 Tohoku tsunami was “red”, with about 65% of the total energy associated with low-frequency waves at frequencies <1.7 cph (periods >35 min). The “red colour” (i.e., the prevalence of low-frequency waves) in the 2011 Tohoku, as well as in the 2010 Chile tsunamis, is explained by the large extension of the source areas. In contrast, the 2014 and 2015 Chilean earthquakes had much smaller source areas and, consequently, induced “bluish” (high-frequency) tsunamis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A Comparative Analysis of Coastal and Open-Ocean Records of the Great Chilean Tsunamis of 2010, 2014 and 2015 off the Coast of Mexico

The Impact of the Chiapas Tsunami of 8 September 2017 on the Coast of Mexico. Part 1: Observations, Statistics, and Energy Partitioning

The 2018 Alaska-Kodiak Tsunami off the West Coast of North America: A Rare Mid-plate Tsunamigenic Event

DART = Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis, is an effective network of deep-ocean stations elaborated for continuous monitoring of tsunami waves in the open ocean and early tsunami warning (cf. Titov 2009 ; Mofjeld 2009 ; Mungov et al. 2013 ; Rabinovich and Eblé 2015 ).

Admire, A., Dengler, L., Crawford, G., Uslu, B., Borrero, J., Greer, D., et al. (2014). Observed and modeled currents from the Tohoku-oki, Japan and other recent tsunamis in northern California. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171 (12), 3403–3485. doi: 10.1007/s00024-014-0797-8 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Aoyama, M., Hamajima, Y., Hult, M., Uematsu, M., Oka, E., Tsumune, D., et al. (2016a). 134 Cs and 137 Cs in the North Pacific Ocean derived from the March 2011 TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident, Japan. Part one: surface pathway and vertical distributions. Journal of Oceanography, 72 (1), 53–65. doi: 10.1007/s10872-015-0335-z .

Aoyama, M., Kajino, M., Taichu, Tanaka, T. Y., Sekiyama, T. T., Tsumune, D., et al. (2016b). 134Cs and 137Cs in the North Pacific Ocean derived from the March 2011 TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident, Japan, 2015b. Part two: estimation of 134Cs and 137Cs inventories in the North Pacific Ocean. Journal of Oceanography, 72 (1), 67–76. doi: 10.1007/s10872-015-0332-2 .

Aucan, J., & Ardhuin, F. (2013). Infragravity waves in the deep ocean: An upward revision. Geophysycal Research Letters, 40, 3435–3439. doi: 10.1002/grl.50321 .

Borrero, J. C., Bell, R., Csato, C., DeLange, W., Goring, D., Greer, S. D., et al. (2013). Observations, effects and real time assessment of the March 11, 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami in New Zealand. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1229–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0492-6 .

Borrero, J. C., & Greer, S. D. (2013). Comparison of the 2010 Chile and 2011 Japan tsunamis in the far field. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1249–1274. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0559-4 .

Buesseler, K., Dai, M., Aoyama, M., Benitez-Nelson, C., Charmasson, S., Highley, K., et al. (2017). Fukushima Daiichi–derived radionuclides in the ocean: Transport, fate, and impacts. Annual Reviews in Marine Science, 9, 173–203.

Candella, R. N., Rabinovich, A. B., & Thomson, R. E. (2008). The 2004 Sumatra tsunami as recorded on the Atlantic coast of South America. Advances in Geosciences, 14 (1), 117–128.

Eblé, M. C., Mungov, G., & Rabinovich, A. B. (2015). On the leading negative phase of major 2010-2014 tsunamis. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172 (12), 3493–3508. doi: 10.1007/s00024-01 .

Filloux, J. H., Luther, D. S., & Chave, A. D. (1991). Update on sea floor pressure and electric field observations from the north-central and north-eastern Pacific: Tides, infratidal fluctuations, and barotropic flow. In B. B. Parker (Ed.), Tidal Hydrodynamics (pp. 617J–639J). New York: J. Wiley.

Google Scholar  

Fine, I. V., Kulikov, E. A., & Cherniawsky, J. Y. (2013). Japan’s 2011 tsunami: Characteristics of wave propagation from observations and numerical modelling. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1295–1307. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0555-8 .

Fine, I. V., & Thomson, R. E. (2013). A wave front orientation method for precise numerical determination of tsunami travel time. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13, 2863–2870. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-2863-2013 .

Heidarzadeh, M., & Satake, K. (2013). Waveform and spectral analyses of the 2011 Japan tsunami records on tide gauge and dart stations across the Pacific Ocean. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1275–1293. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0558-5 .

Hinwood, J. B., & McLean, E. J. (2013). Effects of the March 2011 Japanese tsunami in bays and estuaries of SE Australia. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1207–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0561-x .

Honda, K., Terada, T., Yoshida, Y., & Isitani, D. (1908), An investigation on the secondary undulations of oceanic tides, Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo , p. 108.

Kovalev, P. D., Rabinovich, A. B., & Shevchenko, G. V. (1991). Investigation of long waves in the tsunami frequency band on the southwestern shelf of Kamchatka. Natural Hazards, 4 (2/3), 141–159.

Kulikov, E. A., Rabinovich, A. B., Spirin, A. I., Poole, S. L., & Soloviev, S. L. (1983). Measurement of tsunamis in the open ocean. Marine Geodesy, 6 (3–4), 311–329.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S., & Stewart, R. W. (1962). Radiation stress and mass transport of gravity waves, with application to “surf-beats”. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 13 (4), 481–504.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S., & Stewart, R. W. (1964). Radiation stress in water waves: a physical discussion with applications. Deep-Sea Research, 11 (4), 529–562.

Miller, G. R. (1972), Relative spectra of tsunamis. Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, HIG-72-8 , p. 7.

Mofjeld, H. O. (2009), Tsunami measurements, In: Eds. A. Robinson and E. Bernard, The Sea , Vol. 15, Tsunamis (pp. 201–235), Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

Mori, N., Takahashi, T., Yasuda, T., & Yanagisawa, H. (2011). Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L00G14. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049210 .

Mungov, G., Eblé, M., & Bouchard, R. (2013). DART tsunameter retrospective and real-time data: A reflection on 10 years of processing in support of tsunami research and operations. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170, 1369–1384. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0477-5 .

Munk, W. H. (1949). Surf beats. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 30 (6), 849–854.

Parker B. B. (2007), Tidal Analysis and Prediction , NOAA Spec. Publ. NOS CO-OPS 3, Maryland: Silver Spring, 378 p.

Pelinovsky, E. N. (2006), Hydrodynamics of tsunami waves, In: Eds. J. Grue and K. Trulsen, Waves in Geophysical Fluids. Tsunamis, Rogue Waves, Internal Waves and Internal Tides (pp. 1–48), Springer, Vienna; doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-69356-8_1 .

Pugh, D. & Woodworth, P. (2014). Sea-Level science: Understanding tides, sueges, Tsunamis and mean sea-level changes , UK: Cambridge University Press, 395 p.

Rabinovich, A. B. (1993), Long Ocean Gravity Waves: Trapping, Resonance and Leaking , Gidrometeoizdat, St. Petersburg, 325 p. (in Russian).

Rabinovich, A. B. (1997). Spectral analysis of tsunami waves: Separation of source and topography effects. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 (C6), 12663–12676.

Rabinovich, A. B. (2009), Seiches and harbour oscillations, in Handbook of Coastal and Ocean Engineering (edited by Y.C. Kim), Chapter 9, World Scientific Publ., Singapore, 193–236.

Rabinovich, A. B., Candella, R. N., & Thomson, R. E. (2013a). The open ocean energy decay of three recent trans-Pacific tsunamis. Geophysical Research Letters . doi: 10.1002/grl.50625 .

Rabinovich, A. B., & Eblé, M. C. (2015). Deep ocean measurements of tsunami waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172 (12), 3281–3312. doi: 10.1007/s00024-015-1058-1 .

Rabinovich, A. B. R., & Thomson, R. E. (2011). Energy decay of the 2004 Sumatra tsunami in the world ocean. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168 (11), 1919–1950. doi: 10.1007/s00024-01-0279-1 .

Rabinovich, A. B., Thomson, R. E., & Fine, I. V. (2013b). The 2010 Chilean tsunami off the west coast of Canada and the northwest coast of the United States. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (9–10), 1529–1565. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0541-1 .

Rabinovich, A. B., Thomson, R. E., & Stephenson, F. E. (2006). The Sumatra Tsunami of 26 December 2004 as observed in the North Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. Surveys In Geophysics, 27, 647–677.

Reymond, D., Hyvernaud, O., & Okal, E. A. (2013). The 2010 and 2011 tsunamis in French Polynesia: Operational aspects and field surveys. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1169–1187. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0485-5 .

Saito, T., Ito, Y., Inazu, D., & Hino, R. (2011). Tsunami source of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, Japan: Inversion analysis based on dispersive tsunami simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L00G19. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049089 .

Sanchez, A. J., & Farreras, S. F. (1993). Catalog of Tsunamis on the Western Coast of Mexico (p. 79). Boulder, CO: National Geophysical Data Center.

Satake, K., Rabinovich, A. B., Dominey-Howes, D., & Borrero, J. C. (2013). Introduction to “Historical and Recent Catastrophic Tsunamis in the World: Volume 1. The 2011 Tohoku tsunami”. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170, 955–961. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0615-0 .

Shevchenko, G., Ivelskaya, T., & Loskutov, A. (2014). Characteristics of the 2011 Great Tohoku tsunami on the Russian Far East coast: Deep-water and coastal observations. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171 (12), 3329–3350. doi: 10.1007/s00024-014-0727-1 .

Simons, M., Minson, S. E., Sladen, A., et al. (2011). The 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: mosaicking the megathrust from seconds to centuries. Science, 332 (6036), 1421–1425. doi: 10.1126/science.1206731 .

Song, Y. T., Fukumori, I., Shum, C. K., & Yi, Y. (2012). Merging tsunamis of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake detected over the open ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L05606. doi: 10.1029/2011GL050767 .

Tang, L., Titov, V. V., Bernard, E. N., Wei, Y., Chamberlin, C. D., Newman, J., et al. (2012). Direct energy estimation of the 2011 Japan tsunami using deep-ocean pressure measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, 08008. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007635 .

Thomson, R. E., & Emery, W. J. (2014). Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanology (3rd ed., p. 716). New York: Elsevier.

Thomson, R. E., Spear, D. J., Rabinovich, A. B., & Juhász, T. A. (2013). The 2011 Tohoku tsunami generated major environmental changes in a distal Canadian fjord. Geophysical Research Letters . doi: 10.1002/2013GL058137 .

Titov, V. V. (2009). Tsunami forecasting. In A. Robinson & E. Bernard (Eds.), The Sea (Vol. 15, pp. 371–400)., Tsunamis Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

Titov, V., Song, T., Tang, L., Bernard, E. N., Bar-Severt, Y., & Wei, Y. (2016). Consistent estimates of tsunami energy show promise for improved early warning. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173, 3863–3880. doi: 10.1007/s00024-016-1312-1 .

Van Dorn, W. G. (1984). Some tsunami characteristics deducible from tide records. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 14, 353–363.

Vich, M., & Monserrat, S. (2009). The source spectrum for the Algerian tsunami of 21 May 2003 estimated from coastal tide gauge data. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L20610. doi: 10.1029/2009GL039970 .

Watada, S., Ksumoto, S., & Satake, K. (2014). Traveltime delay and initial phase reversal of distant tsunamis coupled with the self-gravitating elastic Earth. Journal Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 119, 4287–4310. doi: 10.1002/2013JB010841 .

Webb, S. C., Zhang, X., & Crawford, W. (1991). Infragravity waves in the deep ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96 (C2), 141–144.

Wei, Y., Chamberlin, C., Titov, V. V., Tang, L., & Bernard, E. N. (2013). Modeling of the 2011 Japan tsunami: Lessons for near-field forecast. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1309–1331. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0519-z .

Wilson, R. I., Admire, A. R., Borrero, J. C., Dengler, L. A., Legg, M. R., Lynett, P., et al. (2013). Observations and impacts from the 2010 Chilean and 2011 Japanese tsunamis in California (USA). Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170, 1127–1147. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0527-z .

Xing, X., Kou, Z., Huang, Z., & Lee, J. J. (2013). Frequency domain response at Pacific coast harbors to major tsunamis of 2005–2011. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170 (6–8), 1149–1168. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0526-0 .

Zaytsev, O., Rabinovich, A. B., & Thomson, R. E. (2016). A comparative analysis of coastal and open-ocean records of the great Chilean tsunamis of 2010, 2014 and 2015 off the coast of Mexico. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173 (12), 4139–4178. doi: 10.1007/s00024-016-1407-8 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Mexican Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN, Project SIP 20171223). Additional support for the first author was provided by SNI (Mexican National System of Investigators). For ABR, this study was partly supported by the RSF Grant 14-50-00095. We gratefully acknowledge the Mexican National Mareographic Service of the UNAM and the Laboratory of the Sea Level of the CICESE for providing us the coastal sea-level data and George Mungov (NOAA/NCEI, Boulder, Colorado) for assisting us with the DART data. We sincerely thank Isaac Fine (IOS, Sidney, BC) for useful discussions and for providing us the results of numerical modeling of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, Paul Whitmore and Christopher Popham (NTWC, Palmer, AK) for presenting us precise ETAs for the tsunamis recorded by DARTs 46412, 43412, and 43413 offshore of Mexico, and Maxim Krassovski (IOS, Sidney, BC) for helping us with the figures.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Ave. IPN, s/n, Playa Palo de Santa Rita, 23096, La Paz, BCS, Mexico

Oleg Zaytsev

Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Institute of Ocean Sciences, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, BC, V8L 4B2, Canada

Alexander B. Rabinovich & Richard E. Thomson

Russian Academy of Sciences, P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, 36 Nakhimovsky Prosp, Moscow, 117997, Russia

Alexander B. Rabinovich

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander B. Rabinovich .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zaytsev, O., Rabinovich, A.B. & Thomson, R.E. The 2011 Tohoku Tsunami on the Coast of Mexico: A Case Study. Pure Appl. Geophys. 174 , 2961–2986 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1593-z

Download citation

Received : 04 May 2017

Revised : 09 June 2017

Accepted : 10 June 2017

Published : 28 June 2017

Issue Date : August 2017

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1593-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• 2011 Tohoku tsunami
• Mexican coast
• tide gauge records
• open-ocean measurements
• tsunami travel time
• spectral analysis
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research